Re: [atl_discussion] How to target a UML profile in ATL? (bis)

From: Pieter Van Gorp <pieter_at_example.com>
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 15:17:03 CEST

Hi again,

On 9/5/05, Pieter Van Gorp <pietervangorp@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note that in my profile
> tutorial (http://www.fots.ua.ac.be/motmot/docs/profileTutorial-p5.php)
> I'm also checking for the presence of stereotypes to trigger MOF
> transformations. The main difference is that I use a graphical syntax
> based on graph rewriting. In the upcoming year a student will extend
> MoTMoT such that OCL can be used to specify textual constraints and
> path expressions inside Story Diagrams. Once finished, one will be
> able to combine the advantages of visual and model queries and
> associated transformations.
Of course I'm not underestimating the impact of using a particular
formalism... Since Story Diagrams (or "controlled graph rewriting") is
much more expressive than ATL we should continue to conduct more
complex transformation case studies to see which formalism is most
suitable in what circumstances.

Kind regards,

-- 
Pieter Van Gorp
       Teaching and Research Assistant
       FOrmal Techniques in Software engineering (FOTS)
       University of Antwerp
       Middelheimlaan 1
       2020 Antwerpen - Belgium
       Office: G.304
       Phone: +32 3 265 38 71
       Fax: +32 3 265 37 77
       http://www.fots.ua.ac.be/~pvgorp/research/
       http://motmot.sourceforge.net/
           
Received on Mon Sep 05 06:17:05 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:04:54 CET